The Drawn-Out Death of America, 1988

 

Reagan was president. Bush Sr, vice-president. Scandal was about to touch the White House, like Uncle Touchy McFeely does kids at Thanksgiving dinner, as defined as the Franklin Cover Up/Boys Town/Iran Contras (as those events are interconnected).

The “call boys” were trafficked from the midwest. Funny, how Brokaw calls them prostitutes instead of trafficked kids. And funny, isn’t it, how prosecutors went after the use of credit cards to purchase child sexual exploitation instead of going after those pimping the kids.

Those trafficked kids were used as drug mules, hauling cocaine across the nation. The funds from the coke went to fund the Iran Contras.

 

For more on the subject, I recommend John DeCamp’s book, THE FRANKLIN COVER UP, which details the children abused while in foster care, pimped out to Lincoln, Nebraska elites (including the police chief) by one Lawrence King. It’s a shocking read about the level of abuse these kids endured (and often times did not survive.) and how the media, being insiders with the abusers, ran smear campaigns against the survivors who tried coming forward.

1988 was a pivotal year, for those old enough to remember it. From America and the Soviet Union shaking hands, Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan ever at war. BlackRock was formed. Skrillix was born.

But for those who are old enough to have voted… do you recall the breakdown of the American electoral system that year?

Prior to ’88, third parties often showed up on the map during election time.

An example.

But in 1988, the Democrats and Republicans brokered a deal to share power and exclude third parties from the presidential election.

Up until ’88, the League of Women Voters sponsored the presidential debates. They stopped due to that deal; Dems and Repubs both wanted the LWV to sign onto the idea to give it legitimacy. However, the LWV felt that a two party dichotomy was not in the best interest of voters as it reduces the election into an Us vs Them mentality, instead of finding common ground and unification. You can watch the ten minute long CSPAN report on it here; it’s well worth the watch.

Consider this: why would two seemingly divergent parties decide to cockblock any other party from getting the presidency? Could it be that the two parties are merely a single entity, acting out dramas for the benefit of Americans who don’t realize that they’re looking at the Left and Right hands of the entity that would take control of America if the chain of command were broken? That since 1988, we’ve been on a terrible trajectory of decimating America, from the inside-out? 

I like to think that having actual options regarding parties would be a huge step in fixing what’s wrong with this country. By narrowing the playing field down to a mere two parties, it forces an “Us vs Them” mentality which, I guess, makes the election into Political Super Bowl where only two teams play, year after year, and if you’re with the other team, you’re walking excrement. Because that’s what our country has become: a place of echo chambers. Say the wrong thing, be dismissed as subhuman, worth ignoring. Mocked, name called. It’s prevalent on all sides of the political spectrum. You know what I mean. Libtard, Conservatard… that sort of obnoxious, belittling and dividing behavior.

We’re better than that America. We can call people out by their actions, rather than commenting on their perceived intelligence. Facts work better when it comes to unifying a populace against an entity that rigged the damn system thirty years ago.

Russia did it… after the DNC got caught with its pants down.

 

I can’t help but notice two glaring problems with the whole “Russia did it!” narrative that is coughed up time and again by those lacking the ability to see the truth: (1) that Russia did it only after Hillary’s campaign was revealed to be corrupt beyond hope via the Podesta email leaks, AND (2) in the whole “hacking” narrative, not once is it revealed how Russia manipulated the Electoral College into choosing Trump over Clinton. Because that’s the base of the argument: Russia influenced opinion soooooo much that it wasn’t Clinton’s history, hubris, association with human traffickers or hiding pedophilia in the State Department. That’s without getting into her husband’s shady record of screwing over the poor (welfare cuts, eliminating laws to prevent propaganda, and bringing the prison industry back from when convict leasing laws were deeply frowned upon) and rape. Remember, Russia caused Hillary to lose, because it’s easier to blame someone else than acknowledge a deeply flawed candidate who really shouldn’t have run and wasted so much resources. That’s without getting into her SF312 violation, too.
Russia. Russia. Russia.

Mention any point that doesn’t reflect Russia as the bad guy, get branded a Russian bot. On Putin’s pay.

For those who can’t recall (and I can’t blame y’all; there’s been an avalanche of bs noise pumped out on TV and internet to make sure we can’t forget that Russia is why the Electoral College chose Trump) how it all played out, here’s a very lovely and simple diagram that shows what happened:

The more nuanced answer goes something like this:

Someone with INSIDE ACCESS to the DNC’s mail server gave Wikileaks a bunch of the DNC’s correspondence which demonstrated that Hillary Clinton had been chosen to run as the Democratic nominee back in 2014. Which, in case you weren’t aware, was before the Democratic primaries where Senator Bernie Sanders was doing a hell of a job outpacing the establishment candidate. Here’s a genuine question I’d love answered: why have a primary when the winner is already chosen? Think how fiscally wasteful that is– billions of dollars that could have gone to the betterment of America as a whole instead of treating its citizens as toddlers to be entertained with the puppet theater we got called the Democratic Primary.

That wasn’t enough bullshit from the DNC, oh no, not by a long shot. A man who worked for the DNC was murdered. The police called it a mugging, but nothing was stolen. The DNC provided the family with a PR rep. Clinton’s campaign chief stated in an email that leakers would be made an example of; and thus is the tale of Seth Rich.

“Oh no!” Says the DNC. “We were hacked!”

But instead of handing over the server to the FBI (actually, they made it a point to avoid the FBI) for it to be forensically investigated, the DNC decided to hire Crowdstrike to do a report and let the FBI use that report to determine if a hack happened. Crowdstrike later retracted parts of it’s report, but the damage had been done. News media outlets didn’t cover the fact that Crowdstrike walked back some of its claims regarding Russia’s supposed interaction with the DNC servers.

Newsbud did a lovely video detailing the Real Life House of Cards that the Clintons got themselves into with assistance from the Awans, complete with Seth Rich reference:

 

If you truly believe that Russia is responsible for Hillary getting shafted the presidency, then please explain to me how Russia influenced the Electoral College into choosing Trump. Because for all those who tell me repeatedly that it was Russian trolls on FaceBook that got Trump into office are ignoring the entity that overrules popular vote to push an agenda.

So, what exactly did the Electoral College know about Clinton that made them choose Trump instead?

And do you notice that there wasn’t much hoopla regarding the Electoral College? Instead, deflect onto Russia. Guess it’s easier to blame a foreign country rather than the system Clinton would have been just fine with had they ruled in her favor. So, instead of “Let’s fix the Electoral College to reflect popular vote,” it’s all “RUSSIA DID IT.”

And that right there tells you why the Democrats are a dying party trying to save face instead of actually fix a flawed system they once benefitted from.

Eight Traits of Disinformationists

We’d be lying to ourselves if we actually thought that everyone, especially those in positions of power and influence told us, the populace, the truth every time they open their mouths in front of a camera.

The following list is a part of the “25 Rules for Disinformation” page, but I feel it’s worthy of it’s own article. The stuff in bolded italics are my own “observations” and snarktastic commentary.

Eight Traits of the Disinformationalist

---

(1) Avoidance

They never actually discuss issues head-on or provide constructive input, generally avoiding citation of references or credentials. Rather, they merely imply this, that, and the other. Virtually everything about their presentation implies their authority and expert knowledge in the matter without any further justification for credibility.

-As famously seen with the Russia Did It Narrative, where anonymous sources revealed Russia to be the source of the supposed Podesta email hack, which cost Hillary the election. But know what? NYTimes ended up walking back their assertion of Russia Did It, although with a fraction of the fanfare that accompanied the original narrative.

(2) Selectivity

They tend to pick and choose opponents carefully, either applying the hit-and-run approach against mere commentators supportive of opponents, or focusing heavier attacks on key opponents who are known to directly address issues. Should a commentator become argumentative with any success, the focus will shift to include the commentator as well.

-Anyone who participates in forums like Reddit or Voat, especially in the politics, conspiracy, or Pizzagate subs, have seen this at work.

(3) Coincidental

They tend to surface suddenly and somewhat coincidentally with a new controversial topic with no clear prior record of participation in general discussions in the particular public arena involved. They likewise tend to vanish once the topic is no longer of general concern. They were likely directed or elected to be there for a reason, and vanish with the reason.

(4) Teamwork

They tend to operate in self-congratulatory and complementary packs or teams. Of course, this can happen naturally in any public forum, but there will likely be an ongoing pattern of frequent exchanges of this sort where professionals are involved. Sometimes one of the players will infiltrate the opponent camp to become a source for straw man or other tactics designed to dilute opponent presentation strength.

-As famously seen in the 2016 with Correct the Record and their paid trolls going after Sanders supporters, going to the point of posting child porn in Facebook groups to get said groups shut down.

(5) Anti-conspiratorial

They almost always have disdain for ‘conspiracy theorists’ and, usually, for those who in any way believe JFK was not killed by LHO. Ask yourself why, if they hold such disdain for conspiracy theorists, do they focus on defending a single topic discussed in a News Group (NG) focusing on conspiracies? One might think they would either be trying to make fools of everyone on every topic, or simply ignore the group they hold in such disdain. Or, one might more rightly conclude they have an ulterior motive for their actions in going out of their way to focus as they do.

– As pointed out by ReallyGraceful in her JFK video, why would it be a matter of national security to release ALL the JFK documents if the single person responsible, Lee Harvey Oswald is long since dead?

(6) Artificial Emotions

An odd kind of ‘artificial’ emotionalism and an unusually thick skin — an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal.

But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the ‘image’ and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It’s just a job, and they often seem unable to ‘act their role in character’ as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation.

You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later — an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game — where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up.

(7) Inconsistent

There is also a tendency to make mistakes which betray their true self/motives. This may stem from not really knowing their topic, or it may be somewhat ‘freudian’, so to speak, in that perhaps they really root for the side of truth deep within.

I have noted that often, they will simply cite contradictory information which neutralizes itself and the author. For instance, one such player claimed to be a Navy pilot, but blamed his poor communicating skills (spelling, grammar, incoherent style) on having only a grade-school education. I’m not aware of too many Navy pilots who don’t have a college degree. Another claimed no knowledge of a particular topic/situation but later claimed first-hand knowledge of it.

-Nancy Pelosi once famously claimed to be heartbroken over the death of a shooting victim, who coincidently, was recovering in the hosptial. Wonder why she practiced her speech on what she thought would be Scalise’s death?

(8) Time Constant

There are a few ways this can be seen to work, especially when the government or other empowered player is involved in a cover up operation:

-ANY NG posting by a targeted proponent for truth can result in an IMMEDIATE response. The government and other empowered players can afford to pay people to sit there and watch for an opportunity to do some damage. SINCE DISINFO IN A NG ONLY WORKS IF THE READER SEES IT – FAST RESPONSE IS CALLED FOR, or the visitor may be swayed towards truth.

-OMG Trump won the election, it’s RUSSIA’S FAULT for HACKING the PODESTA EMAILS!!… remember?
That’s how it all began. The story has evolved to the point that it’s unrecognizable from it’s original claims of Russia hacking + Podesta emails = Another Lost Election for Clinton.

• When dealing in more direct ways with a disinformationalist, such as email, DELAY IS CALLED FOR – there will usually be a minimum of a 48-72 hour delay. This allows a sit-down team discussion on response strategy for best effect, and even enough time to ‘get permission’ or instruction from a formal chain of command.
• In the NG example above, it will often ALSO be seen that bigger guns are drawn and fired after the same 48-72 hours delay – the team approach in play. This is especially true when the targeted truth seeker or their comments are considered more important with respect to potential to reveal truth. Thus, a serious truth sayer will be attacked twice for the same sin.

-Oh noes, a bunch of intelligence vets explained how the mainstream media narrative of “Russia did it!” was faulty, citing their own experience in the NSA, DOD, and other such agencies. Other Intelligence vets demanded Obama show proof of Russia’s actions. Suffice it to say, it was never forthcoming.

Remarkably, even media and law enforcement have NOT BEEN TRAINED to deal with these issues. For the most part, only the players themselves understand the rules of the game.

-I argue that those in media HAVE been trained to deal with these issues, always going with those who write the script. The video below will give you an idea of what exactly I mean. Within 15 seconds, it’s crystal clear that those people aren’t giving us news, but a scripted reality, nation-wide.

---

Original author of the list, Marco Torres, is a research specialist, writer and consumer advocate for healthy lifestyles. He holds degrees in Public Health and Environmental Science and is a professional speaker on topics such as disease prevention, environmental toxins and health policy.

There’s an unalienable truth many choose to ignore. |Social Media & QAnon|

What if we lived in a world where all the major news media outlets were owned by merely six entities with shared interests, so that any “news” reported would have a significant bias? Because that just so happens to be the world we live in; news isn’t news anymore, it’s news media, which is less exact than pure journalism. See, actual journalism doesn’t pay well. But being a talking head script reader? You can make $30,000 a DAY for doing as told. Just ask Rachel Maddow.

Here’s two videos. The first one was published on YouTube four years ago. The second one? A month ago. Please note the bias used in the second video (that while the false news script has been around for YEARS, it’s only bad because Trump pointed it out… but they chose to ignore it when Obama was in office? What is up with that? Is consistency not their strong point?)

---

 

If you are new the the QAnon phenomenon, then you’ve got some research to do. The very basic and not very nuanced explanation is that there is a Q Clearance (that’s Dept of Energy aka the Nuke guys) asking Socratic method-style questions on 4Chan and 8Chan; those forums are NOT mainstream, they are considered dark holes on the internet, filled with creeps. Why would someone choose to those platforms instead of FaceBook, Twitter or Reddit, which have way more users than the Chans? Well, if FaceBook is the bastard child of a Pentagon project, one can surmise that other major platforms are as corrupt. For instance, Twitter shadowbans people espousing views that go against the preferred narrative; a Saudi Prince is a major investor, so you know, certain topics are frowned upon. YouTube removes videos from search queries, and/or demonitizes videos from ad revenue if those videos report actual, factual news that YouTube’s owners don’t want shared (YouTube is owned by Google, Google is part of Alphabet, and Alphabet? That’s deep state. I have experienced both the loss of revenue and having my videos hidden for daring to cover a 1995 sex scandal involving a certain two-time presidential hopeful. Since then, my views have all but stopped. Any video I upload is instantly tagged as unsuitable or copyright infringement.) Reddit has actually scrubbed/edited users comments to reflect a narrative and keep information from hitting the masses. That’s not free speech; that’s curation of a specific narrative to serve a purpose. I’ve experienced the censorship firsthand during election 2016, when several of my replies to posts were scrubbed from FB for mentioning the political history of a certain establishment candidate. Combined with FB’s proclivity to decide for the users what is FAKE NEWS, one has to wonder just what is FaceBook’s agenda? I mean, for life in general, one should chew the meat and spit out the bones when it comes to news/gossip/whatever; don’t take things at face value because there’s two sides to every coin; gather facts and decide for yourself what is relevant, what is bullshit, and what is the purpose of those telling you to believe one thing over another. For instance, I wholeheartedly think that readers of this should go explore and decide for themselves just how invasive social media platforms and biased our news media has become.

So QAnon used forums that were unlikely to be tainted by certain algorithms which silence dissenting voices. Such as FaceBook.

 

---

What if we lived in a world where our every movement, spoken conversation, text message or email was recorded and put into a file for future reference? Some may say that’s rather 1984 of them. But it’s true. Americans live in a world where they are tracked, as if banded waterfowl, and their interactions with others documented, creating a profile about likes, dislikes, eatery preferences, social group participation, and locations.

Before FaceBook was a gleam in Zuckerberg’s eye, there was a Pentagon/DARPA project titled LifeLog. The idea behind it was to curate people’s lives, from beginning to end, creating a profile for that person regarding all aspects of their lives.

The day that program got shitcanned, was the day
FaceBook became a company. 

Think about it: how better to curate profiles on people than to have those people create them themselves, allowing them to upload their own photos (and sign away their rights to them), geo-tagging locations such as restaurants/stores/public spaces/friend’s homes via the free app, and giving the users a means to psychologically profile themselves via personality apps through their media platform?

All the while, told that their information is safe,
as it’s sold off and used to manipulate the populace. 

Do you find this alarming? How about this?

Do you like being manipulated on an emotional level in order to follow along a path not of your own rational choice?

So QAnon posts bread crumbs for people to follow, such as the revelation of LifeLog’s death and FaceBook’s birth.

Which serves as a starting point for people to find out information for themselves. That’s one of the things I like about the QAnon movement; that it encourages one to think rather than rely on talking heads. This point was proven lately with Corsi and Alex Jones getting called out for bullshitting their viewers into thinking they have inside contact with QAnon, when Q has stated several times that the only communications they’d make are through the Chan boards, because it’s harder to manipulate/scrub/track through the Chans.

So, with that in mind, this blog will be the depository of the big ass mess we’re currently in, with my observations, and an ever-present hope that you, the reader, will investigate and come to your own conclusions.

Spoiler alert: it ain’t pretty and we’ve been lied to A LOT.